代表性著作
|
||||
FIG. 1. The schematic diagram of the edge photoluminescence measurement with different angle of polarizer. |
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Electrons move freely along one-dimensional nanostructures such as nanorods, quantum wires or nanotubes, but their motion in the other two spatial directions is governed by quantum effects. One important implication of this behavior is that the optical response of these structures is strongly dependent on their orientation. A device that takes advantage of this phenomenon by using liquid crystals to rotate cadmium selenide (CdSe) nanorods has now been constructed by Yang-Fang Chen and co-workers at the National Taiwan University. Chen and his co-workers mixed CdSe nanorods, just 25 nm long and 7 nm in diameter, with a liquid crystal known as E7 and CdSe quantum dots (QDs) — 5 nm-wide zero-dimensional structures in which electron motion is quantized in all three directions. To apply an electric field across the mixture while allowing any emission to be observed, the team injected the mixture between two glass slides coated with the transparent conductor indium tin oxide (ITO). The nanorods cling to the liquid-crystal molecules because the large surface areas involved generate a strong anchoring force. The liquid crystals — and therefore nanorods — can then be aligned in any direction by applying an electric field (Fig. 1). “We discovered that the physical properties of nanomaterials could be manipulated by an external bias due to the coupling between nanorods and liquid crystal molecules,” explains Chen. The nanorods and QDs emit light when excited by a laser beam. The peak emission from the rods, which is yellow with a wavelength of 580 nm, is highly polarized because of the rod’s one-dimensional structure. The 650 nm red light from the dots, on the other hand, remains randomly polarized. This means that the contribution of the two light-emitting components — and thus the color of the emission — is dependent on which polarization, relative to the orientation of the nanorods, is measured. |
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Schematic diagrams showing the fabrication technique of our ZnO/Si-nanotips LED array. |
Figure 2. (a) SEM picture of silicon nanotips after coating ZnO using pulsed laser deposition. (b) CL spectrum taken from the square region drawn in the middle of the nanotip array as shown in Figure 2(a). (c) TEM image of ZnO/Si-nanotips and (d) SAED pattern taken from the square region drawn in the middle of the nanotip array as shown in panel c. (e) PL spectra and (f) multiphonon Raman spectra of ZnO film coated on silicon nanotips and flat substrate.
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
(a) Current densityvoltage characteristics demonstrating the superior power conversion efficiency of the photovoltaic device spreading 6 mg/mL ZnS NPs as compared to the one without ZnS NPs (- - -) under AM1.5. (b) Current densityvoltage characteristics with different concentration of ZnS NPs.
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Demonstration of memory sticker
on various non-conventional substrates with
excellent switching performance.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy image and schematic diagram of the device, where a pn junction is formed by a 140 nm coating of ZnO and a ~940 nm coating of the MOF on top of a 100 nm Ag film. p-Type Si/SiO2 was used as the substrate. Graphene was used as the top electrode.
|
|
I V characteristics of few-layered SnSSe phototransistor. a) The schematic illustration represents a few-layered SnSSe phototransistor. b) Optical microscope image of 6 nm thin SnSSe phototransistor separated by 14 μm gap with two Cr/Au electrode. c) The linear Ids-Vds characteristic curve measured at different Vg from -40 to 40 V, represents ohmic behavior. d) Ids-Vg characteristic curve measured at Vg from -80 to 80 V at Vds = 10 V (under dark and laser power of 310.82 mWcm-2 ).
|
|
Hybrid quantum dot-graphene photodetectors have recently attracted substantial interest owing to their remarkable performance and low power consumption. However, the performance of the device greatly depends on the interfacial states and photogenerated screening field. As a consequence, the sensitivity is limited and the response time is relatively slow. In order to circumvent these challenges, we have designed a composite graphene and graphene quantum dot (GQD) photodetector on Lead Zirconate Titanate (Pb(Zrr0.2Ti0.8)O3) (PZT) substrates to form a ultra-sensitive photodetector over a wide range of illumination power. Under 325 nm UV light illumination, the device shows sensitivity as high as 4.06x109 AW-1, which is 120 times higher than reported sensitivity of the same class of devices. Plant derived GQD has a broad range of absorptivity and is an excellent candidate for harvesting photons generating electron-hole pairs. Intrinsic electric field from PZT substrate separates photogenerated electron-hole pairs as well as provides the built-in electric field that causes the holes to transfer to the underlying graphene channel. The composite structure of graphene and GQD on PZT substrate therefore produces a simple, stable, and highly sensitive photodetector over a wide range of power with short response time, which shows a way to obtain high performance optoelectronic devices.
|
|
(a) Real-time current responses to different mechanical forces including touching, bending, twisting, and stretching forces. (b) Real-time current responses to different sentences spoken by the tester. The inset shows the photographs of as-prepared device attached onto the collar of shirt worn on the tester. (c) Real-time current responses to different hand motion.
|
|
Schematic of wrinkled 2D materials decorated with quantum dots, which is very useful to serve an excellent platform for stretchable random laser. In particular, rGO shows the best performance.
|
|
Recycling and reusable performance of the dissolvable and recyclable random laser (DRRL). (a) Schematic illustration of the recycling process. (b) Emission spectra with different cycle index. (c) Corresponding evolution of emission peak intensity and threshold as a function of recycling times.
|
|
(a) Biasing conditions (VSD,VGS) to access different points in the chromaticity diagram, (inset) schematic view of the vertical light emitting transistor and quantum dot film structure, (b) Photographs of a device with and without QDs under different biasing conditions and the corresponding chromaticity points, (c) EL spectrum of QD/graphene/SiO2/p-GaN LEDs at VSD = -12 V and VGS = -5 V, (inset) photograph of demonstrated white light emission under those biasing conditions.
|
|
All-graphene sandwich device exhibits quantum oscillations of current. a. Schematic representation of the device. The top graphene (GrT) and bottom graphene (GrB) serve as the carrier injection layers to the GQDs. b. Current oscillations due to resonant tunneling of electrons for positive bias. The inset shows the respective positions of Fermi energy (black dot lines) of both graphene at different regions. c. The energy band diagram of different layers without application of external bias. The zero bias misalignment of Dirac point arises from the substrate effect. d. The band structure with the application of positive bias shows a resonance tunneling of electrons. The recombination occurs due to the presence of holes in the valence band. e. Magnified I–V near the Dirac point. The yellow and green colors in the bottom graphene show the position of nearly zero effective mass (m eff) zone for the carriers. Inset color bars are cartoon diagrams representing the variation of m eff around the Dirac point. f. Oscillation of current under negative bias. The I–V shows a π phase difference of current oscillations in opposite bias. The inset depicts the position of Fermi energy of the graphene at different bias voltage. g. The energy band diagram of the composite under reverse bias.
|
|
Schematic illustration of the device structure. The upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) were coated on top of HMM samples. Under the excitation of continuous 980 nm infrared laser, the emission spectrum produces multiple emission lines covering visible range. As a result, white laser action is observed. Printed with the permission from Janis Liu.
|
|
(a) Schematic diagram of the UCNPs/graphene hybrid micropyramidal structure photodetector. (b) (i) Cross-sectional SEM image of the micropyramidal structure PDMS. (ii, iii) Lateral SEM images of the micropyramidal structure PDMS with graphene transferred over it. (iv) Lateral SEM image of the micropyramidal structure PDMS with UCNPs spin coated over it uniformly.
|
|
(a) Schematic diagram of the photodetector. (b) SEM image of ripple structure. (c) Transient photoresponse of the device current under the illumination of 325 nm laser with power 10 nW at the bias voltage of 0.1 V. (d) Energy band diagram of the graphene−MOF hybrid photodetector before and after the illumination of photons and applying an external bias.
|
|
Soft and self-healable random lasers (SSRLs).
|
|
|
Band-gap analysis. a. Econ and Eg of the WS2 MQDs with different carrier densities. b. Schematic diagram showing the doping effect in the band structures of WS2 MQDs.
|
|
Schematic design of a vertical phototransistor, which can serve a highly sensitive photodetector and light emitter.
|
|
|
(a) Device structure of histidine-doped MoS2 based QD-WLEDs. (b) Cross-sectional SEM image of histidine-doped MoS2 based QD-WLEDs. (c) Current versus driving voltage (I-V) characteristics for the histidine-doped MoS2 based QD-WLEDs device; inset is the optical picture of WLED.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structure of the QD random laser device.(A) Schematic of the QD random laser device. (B) Side-view SEM image of the device structure showing each layer is well deposited. Scale bar, 200 nm. (C) Schematic illustration of CFRET. (D) SEM topography of the mixture QD film. Scale bar, 100 nm. The inset shows the real photo of the red-light emission from the QD random laser device.
|
|
|
a) High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of the pristine WS2-NS (inset: zoomed in image of the wall). b) Selected-area diffraction pattern (SAED) of the individual WS2-NS. c) (HRTEM) image of WS2-NS hybridized with CdSe-ZnS core-shell QDs and corresponding d) SAED pattern of an individual hybridized WS2-NS.
|
|
|
Photoresponse to different wavelengths with indication of mechanism; (inset) extracted responsivity at different wavelengths.
|
|
|
a. The schematic diagram of the flexible and rollable HMM structure. b. The flexible and rollable HMM device in a rolling configuration. Scale bar represents 1 cm. c, d. Cross-sectional field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) image of the HMM1/HMM2 samples with thicknesses of gold (Au)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) for 25/40 and 25/30 nm with four pairs, respectively. Scale bars represent 100 nm. e. The iso-frequency curves are plotted at the wavelength of 530 nm for both of the HMM1 and HMM2 samples.
|
|
Spin coating and self-assembly route to prepare PEDOT:PSS and P3HT-COOH on ITO substrates. Schematic illustration for spin coated polymer thin film of b) PEDOT:PSS (top), P3HT-COOH (bottom), and c) self-assembled P3HT-COOH. The insets are the contact angle images of deionized water on fabricated HTMs from (b)–(c). d) Contact angle plot with HTMs with different fabrication methods. e) Surface SEM images and f) GIWAXS patterns showing the evolution of the three perovskite grain types under different HTMs. g) GIWAXS line-cut from f with their FWHM on the characteristic peaks of (110) plane in MAPbI3 on three different HTMs. Zoom-in profiles for h) (110) and i) (200) peaks. j) Integral breadth (IB) analysis using Halder–Wagner plots, where β is the integral breadth of the diffraction peak and S is defined as S = 2 s i n θ λ.
|
|
|
Schematic of the formation of Anderson localization induced coherent closed loops due to multiple scattering in the AlGaN MQWs devices, which enables to generate spectrally stable deep UV laser.
|
|
|
Transfer characteristics of the InSe/WSe2 heterostructure on a flexible PET substrate. (a) Photograph of the custom-made metal clamp setup used for applying strain to the device and schematic representation of the tensile strain application and laser illumination on the device. (b) Change in threshold voltage (Vth) of peak 1 as a function of applied strain. (c) Transfer characteristics of the device were measured at different strain conditions with a constant laser power illumination and a constant Vds. (d) Schematic illustration of two parallel conduction pathways taking place in the vertical p–n junction with an increase in strain and the graph showing the current distribution along with the interface for different junction resistance values.
|
|
|
Superradiant emission. A) Pumping power density dependence of the emission spectra from the heterostructure at 4 K. B) Irradiation intensity dependence of the obtained integrated emission intensity and average linewidth of observed sharp peaks around 760 nm. (The integrated intensity and linewidth were calculated by deconvoluting the sharp spikes from the spectrum using the Lorentzian function, as shown in Figure S7 in the Supporting Information. The superlinear dependence of the emission intensity on irradiation photon density in the inset can be fitted using y = axb, where the superlinearity factor b of 1.6 ± 0.1 is obtained. The dotted lines are to guide the eyes at the non-linear evolution of the integrated emission intensity against pumping intensity.)
|
|
|
Scale of mediator-assisted CVD. a Schematic of mediator-assisted growth. b AFM image of mediator-assisted WS2 growth result with overlaid cross-sectional height. c Photograph of large-scale WS2 sample with optical micrographs taken at different locations indicating uniformity. d Photograph of WS2 synthesized within a stack during a single growth batch, (inset) photograph of attained growth area from 3” reactor growth.
|
|
|
(a) EL spectra of histidine-doped MoS2 QD-WLEDs under various forward-bias currents. (b) Schematic illustration of the MoS2 QD-WLED band diagram under a forward bias. (c) Photograph of light emission from histidine-doped MoS2 QD-WLEDs. (d) Corresponding CIE color coordinates of the device under forward bias.
|
|
|
The clean production of hydrogen from water using sunlight has emerged as a sustainable alternative toward large-scale energy generation and storage. However, designing photoactive semiconductors that are suitable for both light harvesting and water splitting is a pivotal challenge. Atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides (TMD) are considered as promising photocatalysts because of their wide range of available electronic properties and compositional variability. However, trade-offs between carrier transport efficiency, light absorption, and electrochemical reactivity have limited their prospects. We here combine two approaches that synergistically enhance the efficiency of photocarrier generation and electrocatalytic efficiency of two-dimensional (2D) TMDs. The arrangement of monolayer WS2 and MoS2 into a heterojunction and subsequent nanostructuring into a nanoscroll (NS) yields significant modifications of fundamental properties from its constituents. Spectroscopic characterization and ab initio simulation demonstrate the beneficial effects of straining and wall interactions on the band structure of such a heterojunction-NS that enhance the electrochemical reaction rate by an order of magnitude compared to planar heterojunctions. Phototrapping in this NS further increases the light−matter interaction and yields superior photocatalytic performance compared to previously reported 2D material catalysts and is comparable to noble-metal catalyst systems in the photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction (PEC-HER) process. Our approach highlights the potential of morphologically varied TMD-based catalysts for PEC-HER.
|